Critical problems to solve with IR 1. Human factor. When filling out a questionnaire, sales agents (merchandisers, sales representatives, auditors) often do not carefully evaluate SKUs, prices, quantities, etc. As a result, the questionnaire displays false information about the availability of goods on the shelf.
2. Intentional distortion of reporting by sales agents. Sales personnel enter incorrect OSA and OOS values into the questionnaire, upload previously used photos to SFA, and fill in data on prices from memory. These actions lead to management making decisions based on incorrect data. It is a complex issue, the solution of which lies both in the field of SFA functionality and Image recognition.
3. Non-compliance with the standards of display and work with the shelf. The data filled in by a merchandiser or auditor during a visit to the store requires verification. So needs a photo that is used as proof of the quality of the display. Image recognition automatically checks key performance indicators:
- On-shelf availability
- Merchandising standards
- Out of stock
- Planogram compliance
- Pricing compliance
- Share of shelf
It also allows for a collection of competitors' data, such as Prices, Share of Shelf, Shelf position (middle, lower, high), promo, and point of sales materials.
4. Routine in the work of the sales staff. The need to fill in statistical data in the same format day after day can tire and demotivate merchandisers, auditors, and sales representatives. As a result, we see high rotation and a need for additional sources to search for new employees and train them.
5. Inefficient waste of working time of sales agents. To enter all the necessary information on the visit (On-shelf availability, Out of stock, prices, share of shelf, competitor's promo in price, etc.), you must first manually check the SKU on the shelf with your eyes, and then manually enter the data into the application. The built-in Image recognition module in SFA lets you get most of the data automatically while avoiding human error.
6. Additional costs for checking reports and photos by project analysts. Usually, to make sure that the merchandiser visits the store correctly and merchandising standards are met, project analysts randomly check 15-30% of visits. At the same time, the analyst verifies the photo and the entered data. So we spend money on the work hours of an expensive analyst who can still make human errors.